On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> That'd only leave us with the apache bug. >>>> >>>> There's a patch available for that now, right? >>> >>> Yes. It has been included in the upload to experimental 1.5 days ago: >>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libapache2-mod-perl2/news/20151130T194855Z.html >> >> I will run some test builds with perl 5.22, that package, and the packages >> build-depending on libapache2-mod-perl2 over the next day or so. Then >> hopefully we can really get this transition under way! > > I've tested the packages which were blocked by libapache2-mod-perl2 > today, and filed two new bug reports, against libembperl-perl[1] and > libapache-gallery-perl[2]. The former unfortunately has a history of > breaking with new perl releases and fixes may not be forthcoming; > it also has a low and diminishing popcon, so I think at this stage we > should not let it block our transition. > > The latter is a trivial fix (and does not block the transition as > it's an arch:all package); I expect it will be fixed either by the > maintainer, or by NMU, soon. > > I will try some real world testing with the new libapache2-mod-perl2 > package in sid/perl 5.20 later this week, and then I think we can plan > to go ahead with the transition after that - as soon as this weekend > if other ongoing transitions allow?
Yeah, that's probably fine. Let us know how your tests go. Cheers, Emilio
