Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/11/15 16:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:36:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>>>>>>> So do I start with an soname change and upload that to >>>>>>>> experimental? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes please. >>>>>> >>>>>> So that has passed the new queue now. Please let me know when I >>>>>> can start this in unstable. >>>>> >>>>> Looking at the tracker there are (as I suspected) quite a number of >>>>> collisions with the ongoing g++ work. We'll try and arrange a slot when >>>>> things are calmer. >>>> >>>> So any idea when you'll have time for this? >>> >>> Possibly after the perl one, if the libstdc++ one allows for this (I need to >>> check). This is in my radar. >> >> Do the rdeps build against the new version? IOW, are there any users of the >> removed methods? > > There are users of the removed method. But all known ones should > have been changed to either not use it anymore or use it > conditionally.
By conditionally do you mean guarded by #ifdefs ? Anyway, let's go ahead with this. The three libraries that are part of the libstdc++ transition and haven't been renamed yet are gdcm and libzypp, which aren't in testing, and pjproject, which I may remove from testing if it doesn't get fixed soon. Cheers, Emilio
