On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:36:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >>>>>> So do I start with an soname change and upload that to > >>>>>> experimental? > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes please. > >>>> > >>>> So that has passed the new queue now. Please let me know when I > >>>> can start this in unstable. > >>> > >>> Looking at the tracker there are (as I suspected) quite a number of > >>> collisions with the ongoing g++ work. We'll try and arrange a slot when > >>> things are calmer. > >> > >> So any idea when you'll have time for this? > > > > Possibly after the perl one, if the libstdc++ one allows for this (I need to > > check). This is in my radar. > > Do the rdeps build against the new version? IOW, are there any users of the > removed methods?
There are users of the removed method. But all known ones should have been changed to either not use it anymore or use it conditionally. Kurt
