On 27/05/14 23:11, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> tags 747609 + confirmed pending >> forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html >> thanks > > Thanks! > >> On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>>> During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the >>>> process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. >>>> As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. >> >> Created. >> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> Ben file: >>>> >>>> title = "ruby2.0"; >>>> is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; >>> >>> you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as >>> they often won't depend on ruby directly. >> >> How would we know whether they are good or bad if they don't depend or build >> depend on ruby? > > They get dependencies on librubyX.Y generated dynamically based on the > ones used at build time. They build-depend on gem2deb, which in turn > will depend on the right rubyX.Y/librubyX.Y
Adjusted. It doesn't seem to make much of a difference though. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5386440e.7090...@debian.org
