Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:04:08 +0200
with message-id <53aa03e8.5000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#747609: ruby2.0 removal transition: request for NMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #747609,
regarding transition: ruby2.0 removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
747609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make
sure that ruby2.0 is also not included in jessie.
Similar to the ruby1.9.1-rm transition, we expect this to be rather
smooth, but work on this is only starting now.
What we'll need from you in the first step is the ben page.
During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the
process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings.
As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file.
Thanks,
Christian
Ben file:
title = "ruby2.0";
is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/;
is_good = !.depends ~ /ruby2.0/ & !.build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.0/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05/06/14 16:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 01/06/14 16:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 01/06/14 06:02, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>>> I have NMUed obexftp and submitted patches for the other two.
>>>
>>> Cool.
>>>
>>>> Now I would like to request binNMUs for the following packages:
>>>
>>> All scheduled, except for ruby-narray which was just uploaded.
>>
>> All done now. There are a few failures but things are looking good.
>>
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
>
> Yep. I will get to those failures at some point.
I gave back ruby-yajl on armhf and it built fine. I also aged qdbm a bit so that
it would migrate, and since that was the last package unconditionally depending
on ruby2.0 (there's still e.g. ruby-fftw3 depending on libruby2.0 | libruby2.1),
I hinted britney to remove ruby2.0, and she did that. So since ruby2.0 is out of
testing and it's got a "keep out of testing" RC bug, I'm closing this. Note that
it's still in unstable, but for that you need to report a bug against
ftp.debian.org.
Thanks for your work.
Regards,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
