Am 18.09.2013 15:38, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs: > On 18 September 2013 03:42, Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see >>> as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but >>> allow the bugs opened for that goal to be of severity 'important'. >> >> I am not sure if this qualify as "Release goals". So I'd like to ask >> first what people think of using C++11 in the next release. >> >> I know of a couple of C++ libraries which could be compiled with the >> new gcc compilation option. And I have at least one application (no >> shared lib) which requires C++11 to compile properly. Since C++11 >> introduce an ABI incompatibility [*], this may not be a Release Goal >> but simply a tech-ctte decision. >> >> Comments ? >> > > I think I have replied about similar requests before (not sure if it > was on these mailing lists). > In essence, at the moment we do not have any compiler & stdlib with > complete and stable ABI for C++11. > It is expected that gcc4.8 will break C++11 ABI to further implement > the standard.
Well, GCC 4.8 should not "break" anything more. Upcoming GCC versions may be another matter. Did somebody try to rebuild the archive in c++11 mode? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5239b2c2.8070...@debian.org
