On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 11:34 +0100, Platonides wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I noticed a couple of changes I don't remember seeing in the diff sent
> > to the list. Namely,
> > * debian/patches/bz29635.patch
> > * debian/patches/fix_invalid_xhtml.patch
> > * debian/control (dependency update)
[...]
> I'm quite sure those patches were already included in debian version of
> 1.19.2.
That may be so, but you're quite wrong. :-)
Based on
"debdiff
/srv/ftp.debian.org/mirror/pool/main/m/mediawiki/mediawiki_1.19.{2-2,3-1}.dsc":
The first patch was *not* in the 1.19.2 package:
--- mediawiki-1.19.2/debian/patches/bz29635.patch 1970-01-01
00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ mediawiki-1.19.3/debian/patches/bz29635.patch 2012-10-09
12:24:58.000000000 +0000
--- mediawiki-1.19.2/debian/patches/series 2012-09-20
11:45:26.000000000 +0000
+++ mediawiki-1.19.3/debian/patches/series 2012-10-09
12:18:24.000000000 +0000
[...]
+bz29635.patch
The invalid HTML patch has gained changes for:
+• <img> tags must always have an alt attribute
debian/control:
-Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql |
php5-sqlite, ...
+Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql | php5-sqlite |
php5-mysqlnd, ...
The subversion history tends to agree. 1.19.2-2 was uploaded on October
2nd. bz29635.patch was created on October 9th. That's the same date the
other changes were made according to the log.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1355568789.32176.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
