On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 03:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tuesday 14 August 2012 08:38 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:16:04AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > >> On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>> The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it > >>> involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is > >>> > >>> 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the > >>> only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an > >>> unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being > >>> part of the release. > >> Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the > >> Wheezy release? > > > > Did you read (and understand) what he wrote? > > Forgive me, not sure. I did read, but am not well versed with all your > terminologies here.
There wasn't that much terminology in there. :-) Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in testing and the version in unstable. The size of the changes means that it'll take some time to go through. Reducing the size of that job by producing a filtered diff that excludes e.g. documentation and test-suite changes would likely help. Unless the udeb changes touched anything outside of debian/ (which I would suspect they didn't) then dropping those changes now is unlikely to make any material difference to the size of the diff. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1345403474.31960.139.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
