On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 14:56 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcgroup.html
>
> Currently I have a problem though, policycoreutils in testing depends on
> libcgroup1 which isn't in testing.
Really? Which architecture at you seeing that on? There shouldn't be
any packages in testing which depend on libcgroup1, otherwise it
wouldn't have managed to be removed.
policycoreutils in unstable does indeed depend on libcgroup1; is that
what you meant?
> According to the above a low priority
> package was uploaded 5 days ago. Is it possible to get it back into testing
> sooner so other packages that depend on it can be installed? It's currently
> impossible to run SE Linux on a system that's been upgraded from Squeeze to
> Testing due to this.
$ grep-excuses libcgroup
libcgroup (- to 0.38-1)
Maintainer: Jon Bernard
Too young, only 5 of 10 days old
cgroup-bin (i386, amd64, armel, armhf, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
s390x, sparc) has new bugs!
Updating cgroup-bin introduces new bugs: #618956
Without a largish britney hammer, it's not going to migrate again until
that bug is sorted out.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1340601545.3586.68.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
