On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 13:44 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > Major change is to deal with grave: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650678 [...] > > #554162 was a more useful reference there, imho. > > > (quilt)) suggested NMU > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635746 > > Likewise #544232, as the newer bug is purely about the suggested NMU, > > not what the actual problem was. > > so -- in general -- should I list all of them as well (even those closed > and archived in sid)? ignorantly I thought that it should be still open > squeeze-tagged bug reports...
For the changelog, open bugs would be okay, particularly if the others are archived. I mostly meant in terms of referencing the bugs in your mail to the list. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329591855.23989.7.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
