> > full patch attached -- I just want to hear your feedback first and > > then will do additional testing to assure correct behavior on a stable > > system > Well, even lenny has "python" as 2.5, so the double try shouldn't really > be necessary. Other than that, please go ahead; thanks.
it just was taken from upstream commit and upstream is still 2.4 compatible -- I saw no reason to tune it up > > Major change is to deal with grave: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650678 > > which prevented use of fail2ban with multiple jails enabled. It has > > been in unstable and testing for a while and I have not heard about any > > negative feedback > #554162 was a more useful reference there, imho. > > (quilt)) suggested NMU > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635746 > Likewise #544232, as the newer bug is purely about the suggested NMU, > not what the actual problem was. so -- in general -- should I list all of them as well (even those closed and archived in sid)? ignorantly I thought that it should be still open squeeze-tagged bug reports... -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120218184423.gs16...@onerussian.com
