On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 18:15 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Adam, hi Cajus + Benoit, > > On Montag, 26. Dezember 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > ldap2zone-0.1/debian/patches/05_correct_bashisms_ldap2bind.dpatch > > What does the proposed change have to do with fixing bashisms? > > in the 0.2-2 upload (which is in sid and will reach wheezy in 2 days) the > patch is just called debian-changes-0.2-2.
Mmmm, dpkg auto-patches. > > I have to admit that my first thought here was much the same as > > Julien's - if the problem is that mail is being sent on the successful > > completion of a job which is expected to succeed, why is a change also > > being made to the failure path? > > So, for a squeeze update only the failed branch of the if statement should be > changed. (I agree with that too, fwiw.) (Right, Adam? No need to reply if > "yes" :) Hmmm, if you're starting from the Squeeze package, then "only the /success/ branch of the if statement should be changed", surely? Regards, Adam (replying in any case :P) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1325440895.2980.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
