On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > On Dec 25, 2011 19:42 "Andres Mejia" <mcita...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have finished checking what changes were required for gmameui, >> tuxcmd-modules, and deb-gview in order to build with both the current >> version of libarchive (2.8.5) and the latest version (3.0.2). >> Fortunately, all changes required are trivial. I filed bug reports and >> patches in the following locations. >> >> gmameui: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653231> >> tuxcmd-modules: >> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653233> >> deb-gview: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653237> >> >> As said before, all other packages simply need to be binNMUed. The >> package 'hydrogen' requires a sourceful upload for a seperate issue. >> >> With all this said, I am requesting a transition slot for the >> transition from libarchive 2.8.5 to libarchive 3.0.2. >> >> >> > > > Hi, > > Thanks for rebuild testing the packages. > > I have setup a tracker for the libarchive transition at [1], please confirm > it matches your expectations.
Yes, this is what I expect. > In regards to timing, we will have to wait until the evolution3.2 transition > is over[2]. We will get back to you when it is done. Very well. > ~Niels > > [1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libarchive.html > > [2] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/evolution3.2.html > -- Regards, Andres Mejia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALgfg4gdFXk3KhHAR=on2KNs8EzTPUfJZAmgay0m=3xxq1z...@mail.gmail.com
