On Dec 25, 2011 19:42 "Andres Mejia" <mcita...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have finished checking what changes were required for gmameui,
> tuxcmd-modules, and deb-gview in order to build with both the current
> version of libarchive (2.8.5) and the latest version (3.0.2).
> Fortunately, all changes required are trivial. I filed bug reports and
> patches in the following locations.
> 
> gmameui: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653231>
> tuxcmd-modules:
> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653233>
> deb-gview: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653237>
> 
> As said before, all other packages simply need to be binNMUed. The
> package 'hydrogen' requires a sourceful upload for a seperate issue.
> 
> With all this said, I am requesting a transition slot for the
> transition from libarchive 2.8.5 to libarchive 3.0.2.
> 
> 
> 


Hi,

Thanks for rebuild testing the packages.

I have setup a tracker for the libarchive transition at [1], please confirm it 
matches your expectations.

In regards to timing, we will have to wait until the evolution3.2 transition is 
over[2].  We will get back to you when it is done.

~Niels

[1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libarchive.html

[2] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/evolution3.2.html




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111225220932.385e047243...@bmail03.one.com

Reply via email to