On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:49:39 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Dependency analysis only derives its output from Sources + i386,
which is
precisely _why_ it's showing ia32-libs-dev as unavailable. It's not
being
mentioned because it's unavailable on kfreebsd-amd64, it's being
mentioned
because it's unavailable _on i386_.
I did finally just realize this as stated in my last message :( My
bad.
No worries, it's not the most obvious of output to try and work out.
If we annotated the dependencies, it
would say "wine-unstable[i386] depends on ia32-libs-dev which is not
available in testing", which doesn't seem like it would be helpful.
But wine-unstable[i386] does not build-depend on ia32-libs-dev at
all,
and that wouldn't make any sense. So, it seems another problem here
is that the "ia32-libs-dev [amd64 kfreebsd-amd64]" build-depends is
being interpreted wrongly.
Well, it's not being interpreted at all, really... :-/ The code does
this, where @alternatives may only contain a single item:
for my $p (@alternatives) {
...
if ($p =~ /(.+?)\s*\[(.+?)\]/) {
$p = $1;
}
i.e. the architecture information is simply discared.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cd5a2dcdfb6090aa9e1b0d791b6ac...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
