On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 21:50 -0400, Sam Bisbee wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:26:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 16:28 -0400, Sam Bisbee wrote: > > > Risking circular logic/discussion... > > > > > > - If mawk is pseudo-essential, then should we even really need to > > > outline it > > > as a dependency? My gut says "yes" because of the pseudo part. > > > > base-files is Essential, and its pre-dependency on awk is not going to > > change in stable. You can assume that awk is in all but name Essential > > in stable, so the dependency should be removed. [...] > Gotcha, I'll remove it from both 0.8.0-2+lenny1 and our next release(s), and > test tonight. Will this make 0.8.0-2+lenny1 sufficiently clean for release to > stable?
Yep, that looks fine; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1274251187.3289.12005.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
