On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 11:37:50AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:56:19PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >> Pushing an untested package into the frozen lenny is not an option, so > >> removal seems to be the most reasonable course. > >> > > OK. Based on #492933, I asked for a removal from testing. After that, > > I asked about the possibility for inclusion in Lenny on #debian-release > > and the impression that I got from vorlon and dato was that if the > > changes were limited, that it would be possible to get an exception. > > The changes aren't limited, that's the problem here. We have a few > hundred lines of code changes in the diff. > > > (please note that upstream never released version 1.2, he went from > > 1.1 a little over two years ago to 1.3 just last week). > > Interestingly enough, upstream has a changelog entry for version 1.2. >
The 1.3-1 releaseforge package has been in unstable for over a week now. I and the submitter of #492933 have both tested the new package and found it to work. I would like to renew my request for a freeze exception. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
