On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:56:19PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As of about one week ago, version 1.3 is now available from upstream > > [2]. This version works with all the changes to SourceForge's site. > > My first instinct was to simply request removal of the package. > > However, that is undesirable as it has already shipped with a stable > > release (version 1.1-1 is in Etch). Removal from Lenny would leave Etch > > users without any sort of upgrade path. Leaving the current version in > > Lenny would, however, result in a package that is completely broken for > > Lenny's entire life cycle. > > Pushing an untested package into the frozen lenny is not an option, so > removal seems to be the most reasonable course. > I hate to leave current users with only the option of using the package from my personal repository or getting it from backports.
Since the package has no r-deps, would you consider allowing a migration after an extended period in unstable? Say 15 or 20 days? If that is out of the question, what is the procedure to have it removed? File an RC bug against the package? Regards, -Roberto Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
