Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:34 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 17:57 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:23:53PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 20:08 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
So what should I do now?
1. Do nothing, let all the bugs in testing enter the lenny release
2. Do nothing, get a freeze exception for the new scotch, which
would let libmesh go in
3. Upload scotch 5.0.1.dfsg-1lenny1 (which needs to go through the
NEW queue, but the changes are much smaller than 5.0.6) and
libmesh 0.6.2.dfsg-1lenny1 depending on it
4. Upload libmesh 0.6.2.dfsg-1lenny1 depending on the old scotch
with only static libs, but closing the other six bugs in libmesh
Which would you accept?
As the bugs are not that important from a release point of view, I'm
afraid that option 1 is the one we would prefer. Option 4 could also be
a possibility, though please upload to unstable in that case using
debian revision 3.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]