On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > That's not how hinting works. > Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency.
Please contact d-release next time to get the issue resolved. > OK, please remove false liblame-dev dependency from m68k (sparc seems > to be removed meanwhile). This is done. > So vice can be arch: all, even if s390 says not-for-us, right? Not arch:all (architecture independent) but arch:any (as it's architecture dependent), but yes. The s390 porter noted to remove the not-for-us. I also reported a RC bug about this. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern (proud) Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Ubuntu MOTU `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature