Hi Steve, On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > That's not how hinting works. Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency.
> But that seems unlikely to happen, since you've removed s390 and sparc from > the architecture list for this package for reasons completely unrelated to > portability. If you need help getting action taken regarding a wrong > dep-wait on a buildd, please ask debian-release -- but don't just decide to > stop supporting an architecture. OK, please remove false liblame-dev dependency from m68k (sparc seems to be removed meanwhile). > s390 may be a different matter since the package has been marked > "Not-for-us" (grumble) by the buildd maintainer; but the binary still has to > be removed from unstable to let the package propagate naturally into > testing. So vice can be arch: all, even if s390 says not-for-us, right? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
