On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2007-10-27 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:25:19PM +0100, David wrote:
> >> A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete" > >> version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web > >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new version > >> 3.1.2-3 was accepted on 3 October. Is there any error, that it is taking so > >> long? > > There is no binary package named fftw3 in unstable. The new binary package > > name is libfftw3-3. > >> I think that 3.1.2-3 should enter sid ASAP, or otherwise a binNMU should be > >> provided. > > BinNMUs are needed for the *reverse depends* of fftw3, not of fftw3 itself. > Hello, > I do not get it: > (SID)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show libfftw3-3 | \ > grep -E '^Pa|Pro|Dep|Re|Ve' > Package: libfftw3-3 > Version: 3.1.2-3 > Replaces: fftw3 > Provides: fftw3 > libfftw3-3 provides fftw3 and all dependencies on fftw3 are > unversioned (I only checked sid, not lenny). So 3.1.2-3 should really > simply be able to propagate to testing without any binNMUs.. Ah - the only remaining issue seems to be that the newest fftw3 isn't built/uploaded yet on sparc, so upgrading fftw3 in testing drops the previous fftw3 binary package and leaves all reverse-deps uninstallable on sparc only. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
