On 2007-10-27 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:25:19PM +0100, David wrote:
>> A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete" >> version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new version >> 3.1.2-3 was accepted on 3 October. Is there any error, that it is taking so >> long? > There is no binary package named fftw3 in unstable. The new binary package > name is libfftw3-3. >> I think that 3.1.2-3 should enter sid ASAP, or otherwise a binNMU should be >> provided. > BinNMUs are needed for the *reverse depends* of fftw3, not of fftw3 itself. Hello, I do not get it: (SID)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show libfftw3-3 | \ grep -E '^Pa|Pro|Dep|Re|Ve' Package: libfftw3-3 Version: 3.1.2-3 Replaces: fftw3 Provides: fftw3 libfftw3-3 provides fftw3 and all dependencies on fftw3 are unversioned (I only checked sid, not lenny). So 3.1.2-3 should really simply be able to propagate to testing without any binNMUs.. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
