On Thursday, June 25, 2026 12:16:10 PM Mountain Standard Time Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Soren, > > On 25-06-2026 20:26, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > > The failure is simply that the Build-Dependencies cannot be satisfied on > > loong64. As far as I know, they have never been satisfiable. > > > > While a package is in testing, the testing migration checks for > regressions with respect to what's in testing. For this package, the > test already failed in testing, so there was no regression. However, the > package got removed from testing and is now treated as a new package. > Failures are blockers for new packages. Unfortunately, due to the logic > in the migration software for new architectures, the calculation of > which architectures to skip is currently broken on loong64. Failures > like you mention here are accepted for arch:all building sources, but if > the tooling doesn't automatically figure it out require people to > contact us, like you did with this mail. I'll add a hint. > > Paul
Thanks for the explanation and the hint. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
