Your message dated Wed, 2 Apr 2025 19:45:47 +0200
with message-id <z-13y2czfrup4...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1099045: transition: fuse3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099045,
regarding transition: fuse3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1099045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:fuse3
X-Debbugs-CC: k...@debian.org
Hi RMs,
There were some ABI breaks in the latest versions of fuse3 and thus
those were not packaged. Upstream to solve these issues, along with
other fixes, increased the soname of the library. This release is
still RC, but packaged and available from experimental. I've done the
rebuilds and the API basically the same, only two packages FTBFS.
The first is vuos (bug filed [1]) a relatively new package. The other
is qemu, but as its failure is not related to fuse3, I did not file it
yet. It failed for me in the past too, but not on buildds. Especially
that it built fine with the new fuse3 package version in a tainted
chroot. I suspect it's not a real problem but some issue in my setup.
I added kibi as Cc as fuse3 has an udeb.
Thanks for consideration,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1098735
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-03-13 14:39:48 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 11/03/2025 16:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > László Böszörményi (GCS) <g...@debian.org> (2025-03-11):
> > > Almost two weeks have passed. Friendly ping, do you ACK or NACK this
> > > fuse3 transition kibi?
> >
> > Sorry for the delay and thanks for the reminder…
> >
> > Glancing at the packages in unstable and experimental, the diff between
> > both udebs looks good, as does the updated shlibs file. As far as d-i is
> > concerned, feel free to go ahead.
>
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
