Hi Sebastian, On 2025-03-01 18:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2025-03-01 15:47:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Anyway I have started to look briefly at autopkgtest regressions, and it > > appears that my assumption that checking executable stack only on amd64 > > was going to be representative for all architecture was wrong. It seems > > that at least hand written neon code on armel/armhf also causes the > > stack to be executable. I'll scan the archive on other architectures but > > that will take some time... In the meantime I have already found: > > > > nmu 3 libde265 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build > > without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" > > nmu libmad . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without > > executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" > > nmu x264 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without > > executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" > > Scheduled.
Thanks. I have finished scanning the archive for the other architectures. Fortunately the number of affected packages are limited. I have found the following binNMUs are needed: For armel/armhf: nmu doublecmd . armel armhf . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" nmu 3 mpeg2dec . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" nmu ne10 . armel armhf . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" nmu pdbg . armel ppc64el ppc64 . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" For armel/armhf/s390x: nmu openblas . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" For i386: nmu 3 libfec_1.0-26-gc5d935f-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)" Note that I am sure about the architectures for doublecmd, I do not think we need multiarch sync, but I might be wrong. Cheers Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
