On 2025-02-28 22:22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-02-28 19:04:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2025-02-26 09:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > 
> > > Go ahead.
> > 
> > Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

Unfortunately this version has a serious bug due to a multiarch
conflict with lintian override files. I have just uploaded version
2.41-3 to fix that.

Anyway I have started to look briefly at autopkgtest regressions, and it
appears that my assumption that checking executable stack only on amd64
was going to be representative for all architecture was wrong. It seems
that at least hand written neon code on armel/armhf also causes the
stack to be executable. I'll scan the archive on other architectures but
that will take some time... In the meantime I have already found:

  nmu 3 libde265 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without 
executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
  nmu libmad . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without 
executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
  nmu x264 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without 
executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"

That will probably requires a new upload to add the corresponding
breaks, but I'll do that once I have collected all of them. And maybe
it'll be acceptable to leave the glibc package migrate to testing anyway
and fix that afterwards.

Also it seems that britney decided to group glibc with a few unrelated
packages, let's hope it'll do better for 2.41-3.

> Thanks, binNMUs with --extra-depends "libc-bin (>= 2.41)" scheduled.

Thanks. Could you please also binNMU dante on non-time64 architectures?
It is only in sid for that reason, but that should make the package
installable again for those architectures.

  nmu dante . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 s390x hurd-amd64 
hurd-i386 loong64 ppc64 sparc64 x32 . -m "Rebuild against glibc 2.41" 
--extra-depends "libc-bin (>= 2.41)"

Thanks
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net                     http://aurel32.net

Reply via email to