On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:53:59PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > tis 2025-01-14 klockan 17:59 +0000 skrev Adam D. Barratt: > > On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 14:31 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> writes: > > > > > > > On 14/01/2025 09:32, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some > > > > > manual process somewhere? > > > > > > > > That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once > > > > manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed- > > > > updates. > > > > > > > > gss | 1.0.4-1 | stable | source > > > > gss | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new | source > > > > > > Thank you! Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's? > > > > No, proposed-updates is. > > > > > Are build logs for > > > 'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere? > > > > In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown, > > where one can select "bookworm". > > Okay, thank you! I will monitor it for any build failures eventually.
Seems to fail in interesting ways on a variety of architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm All available porter boxes are listed at https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
