Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2022-08-28 14:20:48) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> (2022-08-28): > > The current version of libidn2-0 in unstable still wrongly depends on > > sgml-base. A rebuild of src:libidn2 against the version of debhelper > > that is currently in the archive will fix this problem. > > Sure, that's the part I agree with. > > > I added you to CC because you commented on #1015263 saying "This breaks > > d-i builds". The thing that doesn't have a udeb is sgml-base (which you > > pointed out in the same message). > > Let's backpedal a bit, my message had: > > > Judging by the current list of `apt-cache rdepends sgml-base`, this > > problem has already spread quite a bit. > > This breaks d-i builds, (at least) via libnl udebs picking up a > dependency on sgml-base, which doesn't exist in a udeb context. > > There, “this” = buggy sgml-base dependency spreading, which broke d-i > builds *via libnbl udebs* (which was worked around); that wasn't meant > to mean that libidn2 itself was breaking d-i builds. It can't, as it > doesn't build udebs, so it's no factor. > > Hope that clarifies.
Ah cool, thanks! Yes, then d-i is not a reason at all to binNMU src:libidn2. The wrong dependency on sgml-base remains as a reason to do it. Thank you! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
