Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> (2022-08-28): > The current version of libidn2-0 in unstable still wrongly depends on > sgml-base. A rebuild of src:libidn2 against the version of debhelper > that is currently in the archive will fix this problem.
Sure, that's the part I agree with.
> I added you to CC because you commented on #1015263 saying "This breaks
> d-i builds". The thing that doesn't have a udeb is sgml-base (which you
> pointed out in the same message).
Let's backpedal a bit, my message had:
> Judging by the current list of `apt-cache rdepends sgml-base`, this
> problem has already spread quite a bit.
This breaks d-i builds, (at least) via libnl udebs picking up a
dependency on sgml-base, which doesn't exist in a udeb context.
There, “this” = buggy sgml-base dependency spreading, which broke d-i
builds *via libnbl udebs* (which was worked around); that wasn't meant
to mean that libidn2 itself was breaking d-i builds. It can't, as it
doesn't build udebs, so it's no factor.
Hope that clarifies.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
