* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061219 12:07]: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I write down what I think we should do, and how this handles our issues. > > This is explicitly a request for comments, and I want to wait at least > > until either Steve and Joss have both agreed to it, or 24 hours has > > passed, whatever is earlier. > > > So, what needs to be done: > > > 1. Adding back png_read_destroy and png_write_destroy which were > > accidentially removed between 1.2.13-4 and 1.2.15~beta5-0. > > > 2. Conflict with the following packages (from sarge): > > libtk-img (<= 1.3-13) > > Missing an epoch, and I'm not sure why you want a versioned conflict with > this one when the unstable version still has the same problem as the version > in sarge.
Because we "know" the unstable version doesn't fall to bad with the versio in testing - but who has tested the stable version? The underlaying policy is that one conflict to much is less worse than to break stuff. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
