On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > I write down what I think we should do, and how this handles our issues. > This is explicitly a request for comments, and I want to wait at least > until either Steve and Joss have both agreed to it, or 24 hours has > passed, whatever is earlier.
> So, what needs to be done: > 1. Adding back png_read_destroy and png_write_destroy which were > accidentially removed between 1.2.13-4 and 1.2.15~beta5-0. > 2. Conflict with the following packages (from sarge): > libtk-img (<= 1.3-13) Missing an epoch, and I'm not sure why you want a versioned conflict with this one when the unstable version still has the same problem as the version in sarge. > mzscheme (<= 209-5) > pngcrush (<= 1.5.10-2) > pngmeta (<= 1.11-3) > qemacs (<= 0.3.1-5) > povray-3.5 (<= 3.5.0c-10) > 3. Reducing the shlibbump to 1.2.13-4. > 4. No other changes! Otherwise looks ok to me. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
