* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061216 22:20]: > I'll update this as soon as we have more information (and I would also > like to check the symbol lists before an upload - I'm working on this > right now).
Ok, more updates: The exported versions look way worse than I hoped. We have (looking at 1.2.8rel-1, 1.2.8rel-2, 1.2.8rel-3, 1.2.8rel-4, 1.2.8rel-5.1, 1.2.8rel-5.2, 1.2.8rel-6, 1.2.8rel-7, 1.2.13-4, 1.2.15~beta5-0, sorted from left to right, whereas 1.2.8rel-1 is in sarge) the following numbers of how often symbols were exported and not: 1 X ++ 2 X+++++++++ 6 X+ +++++ 7 X+ ++ 125 X+ 191 X++++++++++ (The first line means: We have one case where a symbol was only exported in 1.2.13-4 and 1.2.15~beta5-0, the respective versions in testing and unstable, two cases where a symbol was exported anywhere except 1.2.15~beta5-0, etc.) The relevant graphs and scripts with full information are available at http://ries.debian.org/~aba/png.abis http://ries.debian.org/~aba/exportabi.txt http://ries.debian.org/~aba/abitable.txt Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
