On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:16:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > Hi Gordon, > > On 06-01-2020 16:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2020 15:37:55 +0000 > > with message-id <e1ious3-0002az...@fasolo.debian.org> > > and subject line Bug#944227: fixed in prompt-toolkit 2.0.10-2 > > has caused the Debian Bug report #944227, > > regarding transition: prompt-toolkit > > to be marked as done. > > > > This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. > > If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the > > Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. > > > > (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this > > message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system > > misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org > > immediately.) > > It is very uncommon that a transition bug is closed by an upload to > unstable, as transitions are only finished when the required pieces have > migrated to testing (or have been removed if not transitioning). > Ack, sorry. Thanks for keeping an eye on it.
The transition (as per my original ben file) still lists ipython as depending on python-prompt-toolkit; this has been dealt with for the time being by forking the relevant source packages since this package still has a lot of rdepends, so is no longer relevant for this transition. > Hence, I reopen the bug. > > I notice that python-softlayer needs to be updated for your package to > migrate, but I am not aware that the maintainer has been warned about > it. ginggs asked you to file the bug, but I didn't spot it. Please do so > ASAP and mark it blocking this bug. Opened (#948397). As noted in the bug, a previous uploader for python-softlayer had been involved in the discussions about starting this transition, so I assumed that they were aware of it; however it appears that the uploader list for the package has changed in the meanwhile. > > Paul >
