On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 10:40, Giovanni Mascellani <g...@debian.org> wrote: > > Dear pochu, > > Il 12/11/18 22:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > > The icu transition has started now. Can you make a boost1.67 upload > > build-depending on the new icu, with a bumped shlibs, similar to [1] ? That > > will > > break ceph from sid (which depends on boost1.67), so an appropriate breaks > > would > > be good. However please don't just break all the old versions, as the > > package > > from testing doesn't break (it uses boost1.62) and if you break that, then > > boost1.67 won't migrate until ceph gets fixed (it currently is in a bad > > shape in > > sid). A breaks on (= 12.2.8+dfsg1-1), (= 12.2.8+dfsg1-2) should do the > > trick. > > I do not really master shlibs and stuff yet, so I would like to have > your confirmation the upload is correct: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/boost/commit/7962a7a35514e1351a9545613052f397d9549866 > > BTW, I put the breakages on ceph-common, which is same-version depended > by most of other ceph packages. However others, like librados2, are not > covered. Also, package nheko too depends on libboost-regex1.67.0. Should > that be broken as well? >
librados2 -> it comes from ceph, and ceph-common is enough of an anchor to cause an upgrade in unstable. And I expect ceph in unstable to be rebuilt fairly quickly after this. nheko -> yes needs a breaks, added. > I am also fixing #912910[1] with the same upload, hope this is not > getting in the middle. I will try a local build now. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912910 > this looks ok too. Test building locally too, and uploading. -- Regards, Dimitri.
