Control: tags -1 confirmed On 11/09/2018 09:51, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:41 AM Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> > wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 10:21:41 +0200 >> =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= <g...@debian.org> wrote: >>> The new protobuf -> protobuf-c / grpc chain compiles now on all >>> release architectures. Due to the mentioned protobuf soname change, I >>> have to restart building of all other dependent packages. I'll be off >>> the grid for the weekend, but will do it next week. >> >> Any update on this? > Indeed, missed to post the results. I'm not at home, all I write is > from my head only. I've build tested all the protobuf reverse > dependencies. > About two packages fail for other reasons and those are already > reported as an RC bug. Four packages fail due to protobuf changes and > three of those already reported by you and have an upstream patch. > I've tested those and their build now works. > The last package which fails is gazebo which seems to be team > maintained but it has two NMUs already. There's no bug reported here > for the protobuf update but upstream aware of it and has a patch[1]. > This one is not yet tested by me, but the upstream BTS contains a > comment that's a working fix for gazebo 7.x and the original bug > report[2] states that the fix is in place for the 8.x and 9.x versions > as well. If you have time, please file a bug for this to the gazeboo > source package - but as noted its Debian maintainers are not very > active.
Sounds good. Please go ahead with the transition and bump the bugs to serious. Cheers, Emilio
