Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 22:56 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I looked at this request. > > tl/dr: it contains undiscussed upstream changes and I think it should > be referred back to the submitter for more information. > > > I had some difficulty figuring out what was going on because the pu > bug didn't contain an explanation of the changes in the upstream parts > of the package. To clarify: the proposal is to upgrade from > 10.1_10.1.23-9+deb9u1 to this 10.1.24-0+deb9u1. > > I wasn't able to find the upstream changelog in the source package. > Admittedly I didn't look very hard - I eyeballed the source package. > There doesn't seem to be any discussion from the proponent to explain > what the upstream changes are and why (or whether) they are desirable.
The original request never appears to have made it to -release, presumably due to the size of the attachments. Ondřej, you indicated that "the upstream release fixes two high priority regressions" - would it be possible to confirm / document what those are? Regards, Adam
