I looked at this request. tl/dr: it contains undiscussed upstream changes and I think it should be referred back to the submitter for more information.
I had some difficulty figuring out what was going on because the pu bug didn't contain an explanation of the changes in the upstream parts of the package. To clarify: the proposal is to upgrade from 10.1_10.1.23-9+deb9u1 to this 10.1.24-0+deb9u1. I wasn't able to find the upstream changelog in the source package. Admittedly I didn't look very hard - I eyeballed the source package. There doesn't seem to be any discussion from the proponent to explain what the upstream changes are and why (or whether) they are desirable. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.