On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:50:16AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/07/17 19:04, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:01:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:39:09 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> > >>> We need to distinguish among blockers and non-blockers in that list. E.g., > >>> "fails to run with perl 5.26" is a blocker, but "uses a deprecated > >>> feature" is > >>> not. > >> > >> Just for clarification, most of the bugs which have "deprecated" in > >> the title will fail to run with 5.26; IOW: the warnings are from > >> 5.24, and in 5.26 the issues become fatal. > > > > I've retitled those bugs would could be confusing in this regard. I > > believe that all the bugs which severity: important are the ones which > > would become RC when we decide we want to start soon. > > > > Noting for completeness that Niko has added the other lockers on > > architecture: all related FTBFS bugs as requested by Emilio. > > Thanks. Please go ahead and bump them to severity:serious as we are close to > doing this.
Thanks, done. -- Niko
