On 02/07/17 19:04, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:01:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:39:09 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> >>> We need to distinguish among blockers and non-blockers in that list. E.g., >>> "fails to run with perl 5.26" is a blocker, but "uses a deprecated feature" >>> is >>> not. >> >> Just for clarification, most of the bugs which have "deprecated" in >> the title will fail to run with 5.26; IOW: the warnings are from >> 5.24, and in 5.26 the issues become fatal. > > I've retitled those bugs would could be confusing in this regard. I > believe that all the bugs which severity: important are the ones which > would become RC when we decide we want to start soon. > > Noting for completeness that Niko has added the other lockers on > architecture: all related FTBFS bugs as requested by Emilio.
Thanks. Please go ahead and bump them to severity:serious as we are close to doing this. Cheers, Emilio
