* Thomas Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060402 19:05]: > is it possible that the references were mixed up in the previous mail? I > think [1] and [3] should be switched. > > > All packages which we currently consider for R2 are listed at [1]. > > > sudo: proposed fix exists at [2], > > > See [3] for a list of packages still missing in s-p-u but availible > > via security.d.o. > > References: > [1] http://release.debian.org/stable/missing-security.html > [2] http://klecker.debian.org/~joey/security/sudo/ > [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases > > That said, if a package is in s-p-u, but not in the wiki page [3], does > that mean it will not be part of R2? (The package I have in mind is > 'octaviz').
That means that someone should add it as NOT YET OK to the wiki page. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
