Anthony Towns writes:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [experimental/gnome; experimental/libtool; experimental/kde; etc]
>
> > Now, aj, what do you feel about this, is this solution technically
> > feasible without too much modification of the current scheme ?
>
> I don't believe so; I've looked into similar things before, but it's
> non-trivial.
please could you elaborate on these "things"?
> > If so, then i will setup and maintain a powerpc autobuilder for it.
>
> Setting up a ppc autobuilder for experimental as-is wouldn't be any harder
> than in the above scenario, I would've thought.
hmm, upload a new gcc-defaults to experimental making 3.4 the default
definitely breaks gnome builds in experimental, if you get your build
dependencies from there. an experimental/toolchain would help in this
case.
Matthias
