lance wrote: > > Do you advertise your CD set as "2.2r2", or just "2.2"? I think > > the latter would be accurate enough, and should help to avoid > > complaints from your customers that your CDs are too old.
Actually that was the idea behind it, cd vendors don't advertise 2.2.3 or 2.2r3 but ``2.2'' which is correct. Depending on the time the cds were mastered they are r3, r0, r2 etc. Regards, Joey -- Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee