James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 1) we fix it without changing the _r4 > > This is not an option. Last time we did this, we upset lots of > people, and we made promises that stable would only change when we > bumped a revision.
Fair enough. I think the best suggestion so far is to bump the m68k version to _r4.1 and leave the rest alone. This allows us to fix m68k, but doesn't result in people pointlessly downloading _r5 CDs for i386, sparc etc. only to find they are exactly the same as _r4 for those architectures. Cheers, Phil.
