On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > That's useful to know, but doesn't seem to be correct in the arm case at > least. > > 1. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all out-of-date. > 2. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all priority low.
That's urgency low, and as I said, has nothing to do with it. > 3. geda-gschem is section electronics. > wipl is section net. > speex is section sound. > > 4. geda-gschem < speex < wipl Package: geda-gschem Priority: optional Section: electronics Package: speex Priority: optional Section: sound Package: wipl Priority: optional Section: net They're all priority optional, so we move to the section. The documentation says that section is ordered alphabetically, however, this is wrong. There is a list of the section each having a value. It's ordered like this: libs, debian-installer, base, devel, ..., net, ..., sound, ..., electronics, ... So we first get wipl, then speex, then geda-gschem. And this seems to agree with what you see. > What's the purpose of sorting by section in the ordering? They are also an ordering of what is most important. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
