Op zo, 06-03-2005 te 22:52 +1100, schreef Hamish Moffatt: > Goswin wrote: > > Need-build is a good sign. http://buildd.net/ shows you are on place > > 37 out of 120. I suggest just waiting unless the buildd has stoped > > altogether. > > What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
See <http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states>, under the "needs-build" header. > > I notice that speex (for example) was uploaded on Feb 26 with priority > low and it's 7th on the arm list, but geda-gschem was uploaded on Feb 23 > with priority low and it's 35th. quodlibet was uploaded on March 4 (also > priority low) and it's 6th. > > Is it FIFO within the priority levels? I would've expected so. No. Instead, it is assumed that the buildd queue length regularly reaches 0; when this assumption breaks, we conclude that the buildd pool is unable to keep up, and that more machines need to be added. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
