On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:26:31PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:06:46AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system) > > > > Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). ! > What's left then? Only packages that don't patch the upstream sources at > all?
Really, what's the benefit of 1.0+quilt or 1.0+dpatch over 3.0+quilt?…
Apologies if I'm missing something obvious: I can somewhat understand
people who like 1.0 with direct changes (even if some people find it
confusing, that's somewhat fine by me and I can live with them), so I'm
not really pushing to get rid of them. But 1.0 with a patch system
feels just trying to duplicate 3.0 for the sake of old times u.u
Especially because having the patch system handled in d/rules is
somewhat prone to confusion for patch/unpatch and IME troublesome to
rebase the patches.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
