Hi, On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Christoph Berg wrote: > > The problem is that https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs is still > > reporting this (and thus both the old and the new PTS show this). > > Christoph, are there problems with the latest watch scanner ? > > It's been a while since I last looked at it. TBH, the current > implementation is rather forcefully squished into mole, and should > rather be rewritten than messed up even more.
I would like to merge this into distro-tracker then, because I want derivatives to be able to easily track new upstream versions of their own packages as well. (And this is not only wishful thinking, Kali now has its own distro-tracker setup: http://pkg.kali.org) This probably requires some heavy refactoring of the current Task mechanism but that's something I want to do anyway. > The new vcswatch worker based on a PostgreSQL backend works rather > nicely, that shouldn't be much effort to be adapted. I'll look into > that, but I'd rather not promise an ETA. I should study that to get some good inspiration for distro-tracker's Task refactoring, then I guess. :) That said it would still be nice to have a look at the current "dehs" and kick it back into a working state. It's probably not so hosed that it's unrecoverable. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715074023.gc8...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
