On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I think that one thing that is missing is integration with VCS-based > maintenance. In that context, replacing PET would be a worthwhile goal > too.
I agree but I put this in the interesting extensions that we can build on top of it once we have it. It's the main reason why I have added "that will help packaging teams to organize themselves" in the rationale. :-) Another thing that I just thought of, is that it should replace WNPP for the management of RFH/RFA/O bugs at least. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
