On 27/01/12 at 07:49 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to design a new infrastructure that would replace the DDPO > and the PTS, fix many current problems, and enable us to introduce new > features to help package maintainers. > > I decided to use a DEP for this because I believe it's important to give > it some thought before starting to implement, and also because I'd like to > get something that will be widely adopted. > > So far I have only had the feedback of Zack. I'd like to have at least some > opinions of other members of the QA team who are involved in maintaining > various bits of infrastructure... but anyone is welcome to comment and > discuss the idea. > > The current proposal is at the end in markdown format but you can also read > it online in HTML format: > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep2/ > > This document is obviously a work in progress and I welcome any addition > that you would like to make to it.
Hi, I think that one thing that is missing is integration with VCS-based maintenance. In that context, replacing PET would be a worthwhile goal too. Regarding the design, I think that querying UDD directly should work if: - the queries are properly optimized - the machine is upgraded to something recent (currently it's a machine which was obsoleted by HP in 2005, so there's some margin for improvement). There's work in progress on that by DSA. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120127071855.ga...@xanadu.blop.info
